VIDEO: What made the 1992 Honda Civic a good car?

History has taught us that the EG Civic was one of the greatest compacts of all time, but how was it reviewed when it was new? Surprisingly, it wasn’t for the things we love about 90s Hondas like responsive engines, race car engineering filtered into a humble compact, and stone cold reliability. Instead, it was a bunch of boring things that, 30 years later, no one cares about.

Motorweek tested two Civics back when the EG generation debuted in 1992, a VX hatch and EX sedan. It’s praised for its comfortable seats, ample legroom and smooth ride that “rivals some luxury cars’.” The advanced double-wishbone gets some handling praise, but then is dinged with vagueness at high-speed turn-in. Further complaints include trunk space, abrupt clutch engagement, and a climate control that didn’t work smoothly, whatever that means.

The VX hatchback was the fuel miser, spiritual descendant of the CRX HF. It had a high-tech 1.5-liter multivalve engine, its VTEC system was tuned for fuel efficiency. Combined with a lean burn head (except in California), it produced 92 horsepower while delivering 48 city, 55 highway mpg. Its 0-60 time was 9.6 seconds and it ran the quarter-mile in 17.5 seconds at 77 mph.

The EX sedan, on the other hand, was the top-of-range executive model with a 1.6-liter, 125-horsepower, 106 lb-ft, D-series mill. In this case the VTEC system was tuned for performance, and what it gave up for 29 city, 36 highway mpg, it made up in an 8.6-second 0-60 time. The quarter-mile came at 16.8 seconds at 83 mph.

As it turns out, import racers would soon whittle that down quite a bit. The Civic was a versatile and infinitely tuneable platform that helped create a new generation of hot rodders with a car that even mom and dad would be proud of. The hatch started at a very competitive $8,000, or $10,000 for the tested VX, while the sedan started at an utterly reasonable $10,500, or $13,575 for the EX tester. What’s not to like?

permalink.
This post is filed under: Video and
tagged: , , , .

4 Responses to VIDEO: What made the 1992 Honda Civic a good car?

  1. CycoPablo said:

    Wheels (Australia) were amused with a Honda exec’s take on the body styling: “sleek lines of a flounder fish”.
    https://bauer-archive.x-cago.net/vw/edition.do?page&date=19911101&id=WHL-01-054-19911101&pub=WHL&dp=WHL

    They, too praised the suspension design, but moaned about NVH issues. They liked the drivetrain — the car tested had the D16A9 twin-cam, a revised version of “our” CRX engine.

    The 1.3 SOHC that was initially offered as the base (named Breeze here) was considered a waste of money in comparison to rival offerings at similar prices, with more power and features.

    The Del-sol (named CRX for us) was the beginning of a slow decline for Honda in Australia.
    https://bauer-archive.x-cago.net/vw/edition.do?page&date=19911101&id=WHL-01-012-19911101&pub=WHL&dp=WHL

    Shame really.

  2. Damian said:

    In Australia, I think there are almost none left. Looking at the classifieds, they disappeared on carsales, and now almost completely on gumtree. Was thinking about getting an old Vtir (160hp b series) hatch, but they are all but gone.

  3. Lee L said:

    125 hp and an 8.6 0-60 is pretty damned impressive for a 1992 economy car. Wow

  4. had a 1990 and it got taken out by a small water puddle. sucked up water and bent the rods. toyotas don’t have these kind of design flaws.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *