Great Replica, or Ruined Z?


Autoblog today linked to a video showing a replica of a Ferrari GTO, built off a 240Z donor body. This isn’t an all together unusual project, but each and every time, I find myself asking why. I suppose the answers to that question isn’t hard to guess at: Everyone wants a Ferrari. The GTO is a handsome looking classic. The S30 is a more than suitable donor body.

But still, with all of those things in mind, I can’t help but think of all of this as simply ruining a perfectly good Z. The GTO is a great looking car. Do I think it’s a better looking car than the Z? I honestly don’t. Alright, I’ll concede; it’s better looking than a stock standard Z. But when I think of a tastefully modified Z in the fan-favourite style of lowered, boltons, Wats, fender mirrors, and a nice dark paint job – I just could not take a GTO replica over that. And I certainly couldn’t allow myself to turn it into one.

At the end of the day, I have to salute a job well done, and the two linked examples are very well done.

How about you?

[Autoblog link]
[The above red GTO replica @ CarDomain]

This post is filed under: nissan.

2 Responses to Great Replica, or Ruined Z?

  1. importjap said:

    The problem is; it’s now neither a Z, or a GTO. That’s why it sucks.

  2. exactly importjap.

    If you’re going to make a replica, you’ve got to start from scratch or near enough as possible. The best GT40 and Cobra replicas use very little in the way of shared components with common cars

Comments are closed.